Old and young, they all don’t worry

. The offense has no value for review. Starting from the first quarter, the two sides showed a huge gap in personal development and offense, and this was when Jokic did not exert much force. I said on Weibo that the Warriors give people the impression of having a big model but no chip. The system cannot operate at all without Curry, and it is painful to rely on personal ability without having it.

Some people blame Cole, some blame Dunleavy, and some blame Lacob. In fact, it is not necessary. The Warriors have played wonderful games in the past two years, and the upper limit strength shown in some games is considerable. If these contents appear, you cannot say that the coaching staff and management have done nothing. The Warriors are a team built around 37-year-old stars. You have to accept this setting. There are two aspects of it that are not necessarily stable:

Curry's attendance may not be stable;

Curry's performance may not be stable.

Everything about the Warriors is based on Curry's basic foundation. If the basic foundation is not there, or he is wandering, you should not ask the team to do things that are not at their level of ability.

Then why not introduce a young star to match Curry?

I have talked about this topic in the reinforcement articles in the past two years. If the Warriors want to make a stud trade, it must be a young first-line star that they can build a team around, but this opportunity has not appeared! You'd better not think a deal like Doncic's has anything to do with the Warriors.

If you can't introduce young stars around whom you can build a team, and get Butler for short-term use at a relatively small cost, there's nothing wrong with that. But Butler is also a veteran, known for his comprehensive contributions, and is not the type to absorb a lot of ball rights. This determines that the Warriors are unlikely to develop a long-term solution without Curry around him. He can briefly dominate the offense in the transition period and fill in the aggression next to Curry. The upper limit of leading this Warriors alone was clearly seen in the series against the Timberwolves.

So, with Curry and Butler here, and the two of them in good shape, there is no problem with the Warriors' offensive development. At this time, coupled with the team's hard-working defense, you can see that the Warriors' upper limit is considerable - in fact, "Curry is here, Butler is here, and the two of them are in good shape" may also be Green's subjective premise. When these conditions cannot be met at the same time, the Warriors have no lower limit for a single game, and thus no upper limit for the entire season.

It’s not like the Warriors haven’t considered ways to support the lower limit. I have been harping on that young people need to make progress. Why? Is it just for Moody's three-pointer, Bojie's cleverness, and Kumingjia's body? Even a mature puzzle player can do this.

As a growth stock, the biggest advantage of young people is their imagination space. In the game against the Kings, Richard, Moody, and Kuminga scored 30 points, 28 points, and 24 points respectively. Bojie scored 14 points and 9 assists. Although the ball was lost, we can see some improvement. But facing more advanced opponents, young people are still immature. Before December, they have to come up with more stable content.

There is a lot to talk about the Warriors, and I also know that everyone has a lot to ask and complain about, about Horford, Green, Butler, Payton, young people, leading defense, all aspects, etc. An early observation of the Western Region will be released in the near future, let’s talk about it in detail then.

That’s it, I hope everyone has a happy weekend.

Mini-game recommendations:Ragdoll Arena 2 Player